Skip to content

PA Right to Know Law Blog

Providing highlights and insights about the PA Right to Know Law and decisions of the Office of Open Records as well as court opinions

Menu

HomeAboutContact

OOR: Requested E-Mail Metadata Must Be Provided To Requesters

By Francis Pileggi on October 4, 2020
Posted in Office of Open Records Decisions

This synopsis was prepared by Pennsylvania attorney Catherine Olanich Raymond.

A few months ago, the OOR’s Final Determination In re Scott and Janet Brunermer v. Apollo Borough, Docket No. AP 2019-0589 (June 30, 2020) held that, if requested, metadata relating to requested e-mails must be provided to a party requesting that data, even if the requester has already received copies of the e-mails themselves.

Background and Facts:

Requesters Scott and Janet Brunermer submitted a request to Apollo Borough on February 18, 2020 for copies of e-mails, along with the metadata associated with those e-mails, that were exchanged between the Solicitor for Apollo Borough and the BCO of Bureau Veritas concerning certain real property owned by the Requesters. The Borough contended that it had produced all e-mails responsive to the request, except for one e-mail dated October 23, 2019 which it claimed was exempt due to attorney-client privilege. On June 23, 2020, while the instant appeal was pending, the Borough produced this e-mail as well. However, all of the e-mails were produced in PDF format, so no metadata was provided to Requesters, even though the Borough’s affidavit showed that the Borough specifically searched for metadata.

OOR Analysis and Holding:

Because the Borough’s sworn affidavit showed that all responsive e-mails had been produced and there was no evidence of bad faith, the portions of the Requesters’ appeal relating to production of e-mails was dismissed as moot.

The request for metadata associated with the e-mails presents an entirely different issue. An agency such as a Borough is not obligated to extract metadata from its records in order to produce it; instead it may produce the metadata by producing the record “in its native format.” Slip op. at 7 (citing Davis v. Upper St. Clair Twp., OOR Dkt. AP 2011-0800, 2011 PA O.O.R.D. LEXIS 505). Here, however, the Borough produced only the text of e-mails at issue in PDF format, which did not include the metadata associated with those e-mails. Moreover, the Borough neither indicated whether the metadata was in the process of being provided nor made arguments why the metadata should be withheld. Thus, OOR granted this portion of the Requesters’ appeal, ordering production of the metadata within 30 days of OOR’s determination.

Bottom Line: The RTKL presumes all state agency records are producible public records. This presumption applies unless particular records are shown to be exempt from production under 65 P.S. § 67.305(a) (1)-(3). Here, because the Borough did not argue that the e-mail metadata was exempt, Brunermer holds only that no exemption was proven in this case. Future OOR determinations will have to address potential grounds to exempt metadata from production.

Tags: metadata, OOR
Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Francis Pileggi

Francis Pileggi is a partner in the firm of Lewis Brisbois, and practices primarily in the areas of corporate and commercial litigation.

Read more about Francis PileggiFrancis G.X.'s Linkedin ProfileFrancis G.X.'s Twitter Profile
Related Posts
Recent OOR Determination Clarifies Appeal Deadline
January 1, 2022
OOR: Records Relating To The Investigation And Tracking Of Personal Protective Equipment Not Confidential Under The DPCL.
July 5, 2021
OOR: Information About Officers' Time-Off Request Protected From Disclosure Under The RTKL By The Constitutional Right of Privacy
June 20, 2021
By: Francis Catania & Francis Pileggi

Blog Authors

Francis CataniaFrancis CataniaAttorney

Francis J. Catania is a partner in the Media, PA, law firm of Catania & Parker, LLP, and has been practicing law for over 30…

Francis J. Catania is a partner in the Media, PA, law firm of Catania & Parker, LLP, and has been practicing law for over 30 years.   He represents Pennsylvania municipalities, municipal authorities and schools in responding to Right to Know Law requests and assists private clients who use the Right to Know Law to request documents from state and local government agencies.  His practice includes representing clients about Right to Know Law matters before the Pennsylvania Office of Open Records, Common Pleas Courts and Commonwealth Court.   He has served as Delaware County Solicitor and Solicitor to Delaware County boroughs, townships, school districts and municipal authorities.

Show more Show less
Francis J.'s Linkedin ProfileFrancis J.'s Twitter Profile
Francis PileggiFrancis PileggiAttorney

Francis Pileggi is a partner in the firm of Lewis Brisbois, and practices primarily in the areas of corporate and commercial litigation.

Francis G.X.'s Linkedin ProfileFrancis G.X.'s Twitter Profile

Stay Connected

Subscribe via RSS Subscribe via RSS

Topics

  • Commentary
  • Court Decisions
  • Office of Open Records Decisions

Archives

Resources

  • PA OFFICE OF OPEN RECORDS HOME PAGE
  • PA RIGHT TO KNOW LAW TEXT
  • PENNSYLVANIA FREEDOM OF INFORMATION COALITION
  • PENNSYLVANIA'S UNIFIED JUDICIAL SYSTEM PUBLIC ACCESS TO COURT RECORDS
  • WHERE TO OBTAIN COMMONLY REQUESTED RECORDS

Recent Posts

  • Decision Clarifies Requirements for Affidavit of RTK Officers
  • Recent OOR Determination Clarifies Appeal Deadline
  • Commonwealth Court Imposes Fines for Bad Faith Response to PA RTKL Request
  • OOR: Records Relating To The Investigation And Tracking Of Personal Protective Equipment Not Confidential Under The DPCL.
  • OOR: Information About Officers’ Time-Off Request Protected From Disclosure Under The RTKL By The Constitutional Right of Privacy
Published By Francis Catania & Francis Pileggi
PA Right To Know Law Blog
230 North Monroe Street
Media, PA 19063
Subscribe via RSS Subscribe via RSS
DisclaimerPrivacy Policy

About this Blog

The purpose of this blog is to provide information about the Pennsylvania Right to Know Law and related statutes and decisions. No attorney/client relationship is formed and no legal advice can be given, unless and until a formal and fully executed fee agreement is entered into, and a retainer received. Contact Francis J. Catania or Francis G.X. Pileggi with questions, though we cannot guarantee a reply to all requests.

Copyright ©2023, Francis Catania & Francis Pileggi All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo